Amazon EC2 vs Apache Spark comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,594 views|1,667 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Apache Logo
3,093 views|2,345 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EC2 and Apache Spark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Compute Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EC2 vs. Apache Spark Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is EC2 is scalable, so when you want to move to market, you don't need to wait until your provision is fast, you can just go and provision it and then easily install your application.""The ability to bring up servers and then do the computation and deposit means we don't have to maintain a data center. Everything is virtual and the security is also taken care of. It helps us to achieve compliance. Being a small startup with the security features that AWS provides helps us with compliance.""The ability to quickly spin up instances on demand with zero upfront costs or infrastructure is the most valuable for me.""The amount of bandwidth has been most valuable.""What we have found most valuable is that we have not lost stability in the program.""The product is very mature and organized.""The best features of Amazon EC2 are its high performance and security.""EC2 is secure and stable, and we have no complaints about it on AWS."

More Amazon EC2 Pros →

"Apache Spark provides a very high-quality implementation of distributed data processing.""The fault tolerant feature is provided.""The product's deployment phase is easy.""I appreciate everything about the solution, not just one or two specific features. The solution is highly stable. I rate it a perfect ten. The solution is highly scalable. I rate it a perfect ten. The initial setup was straightforward. I recommend using the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a perfect ten.""This solution provides a clear and convenient syntax for our analytical tasks.""With Spark, we parallelize our operations, efficiently accessing both historical and real-time data.""The deployment of the product is easy.""It is highly scalable, allowing you to efficiently work with extensive datasets that might be problematic to handle using traditional tools that are memory-constrained."

More Apache Spark Pros →

Cons
"We have had some downtime using the solution.""Regional acceleration could improve. If I am hosting a website and I want the experience to be faster they should have this feature to allow for increased speeds.""am concerned about the tool's data security.""The IP changes whenever we restart which is frustrating.""It is a little too expensive.""This solution could be improved with better pricing. If you continue using this solution over a long period of time, your costs may accumulate.""Pricing-wise, it is a bit high.""I would like to see improvement in the information available up-front for users around tailoring the package to their actual requirements. At present it can take time to work with the on demand instance until you are used to what features are right for the user."

More Amazon EC2 Cons →

"It's not easy to install.""At the initial stage, the product provides no container logs to check the activity.""Needs to provide an internal schedule to schedule spark jobs with monitoring capability.""The solution’s integration with other platforms should be improved.""Apache Spark could potentially improve in terms of user-friendliness, particularly for individuals with a SQL background. While it's suitable for those with programming knowledge, making it more accessible to those without extensive programming skills could be beneficial.""Include more machine learning algorithms and the ability to handle streaming of data versus micro batch processing.""We've had problems using a Python process to try to access something in a large volume of data. It crashes if somebody gives me the wrong code because it cannot handle a large volume of data.""Apache Spark's GUI and scalability could be improved."

More Apache Spark Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing appears to be cheap, however, it is extremely difficult in calculating what something will cost."
  • "It has helped to reduce costs with infrastructure."
  • "EC2 pricing is somewhat transparent, in that AWS provides pricing for all instance types. However, the number of pricing options can be confusing."
  • "For our usage, the cost is approximately $20,000 to $23,000 per month."
  • "There is a license required to use this solution and we pay on a monthly basis."
  • "The price is reasonable, but there is definitely an opportunity to lower it in instances which are of a higher configuration, because they have been typically used for the long term."
  • "Amazon EC2 has a pay-as-you-use cost model."
  • "The clients have found the billing of Amazon EC2 good, but the price could be less high. There is a monthly subscription to use the solution."
  • More Amazon EC2 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EC2 is really reliable and provides great flexibility.
    Top Answer:The solution has different pricing models, and its cost differs when you purchase it for one year or three years.
    Top Answer:The solution’s pricing and downtimes could be improved. I would like to have a better pricing model for Amazon EC2 instances because it comes with different pricing models. The solution's cost differs… more »
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    2,594
    Comparisons
    1,667
    Reviews
    46
    Average Words per Review
    347
    Rating
    8.6
    5th
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    3,093
    Comparisons
    2,345
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    AWS Fargate logo
    Compared 62% of the time.
    AWS Lambda logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Apache NiFi logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    AWS Batch logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Google App Engine logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Spring Boot logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    AWS Batch logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Spark SQL logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    SAP HANA logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Jakarta EE logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

    Amazon EC2’s simple web service interface allows you to obtain and configure capacity with minimal friction. It provides you with complete control of your computing resources and lets you run on Amazon’s proven computing environment. Amazon EC2 reduces the time required to obtain and boot new server instances to minutes, allowing you to quickly scale capacity, both up and down, as your computing requirements change. Amazon EC2 changes the economics of computing by allowing you to pay only for capacity that you actually use. Amazon EC2 provides developers the tools to build failure resilient applications and isolate them from common failure scenarios.

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Educational Organization7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon EC2 vs. Apache Spark
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EC2 vs. Apache Spark and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EC2 is ranked 4th in Compute Service with 56 reviews while Apache Spark is ranked 5th in Compute Service with 60 reviews. Amazon EC2 is rated 8.6, while Apache Spark is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon EC2 writes "Easy to scale and valuable features include the security group and key management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". Amazon EC2 is most compared with AWS Fargate, AWS Lambda, Apache NiFi, AWS Batch and Google App Engine, whereas Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Jakarta EE. See our Amazon EC2 vs. Apache Spark report.

    See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

    We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.