"I like the tool's availability and automated scalability. I need to define the port numbers, and when I have a large load of requests, I can get automated scalability."
"The solution is simple to access."
"Overall, it is a user-friendly and efficient tool for managing containers."
"Amazon Elastic Container Service is more stable."
"It is a highly stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature, after using Amazon EC2 Container Service for two years, is to set the availability and also for network throughput."
"The solution is easy to scale and implement and provides performance monitoring and management tools."
"What I really like about Amazon ECS is its simplicity and ease of use. Amazon also has really good security."
"It's a great product if you are in a Microsoft environment."
"Storage is one of the most beneficial features of cloud providers, specifically Azure because when you are working in their cloud environment, you can easily use a storage interface and a storage object that is provided by Microsoft Azure. In a local environment, you have to be involved in establishing and setting up distributed storage file systems for containers which are very difficult and complex. In a cloud environment, you are not concerned about the storage and the dashboard provides you with storage objects with high availability."
"The product makes things easier since it's self-managed. Therefore, there is less administration workload and operational costs."
"Microsoft Azure Container Service has a good level of stability."
"The most valuable feature is that you don't have to maintain the infrastructure."
"Visualization is the most important feature."
"The most valuable features are that it is simple, and the compression of the data."
"It's a complex tool and should be simplified."
"In the next release, they could add some customization options for high computer workloads."
"Amazon Elastic Container Service should simplify its management. It can be difficult for someone who doesn't have much experience with the tool. Also, the tool needs to add the ability to manage networks."
"EC2 is not self-explanatory enough."
"Probably, they should include automated graphing, and monitoring solutions."
"After the load balancer gets attached to Amazon Elastic Container Service clusters, I can't modify, remove, or replace it later."
"Amazon EC2 Container Service's security can be improved."
"The documentation and usage for the users can be better because for new users it can be very hard to understand and use the solution. They can add small images and accessories."
"Since the product is fully managed, it is expensive."
"Standard support could be more helpful and responsive."
"I wasn't very impressed with the documentation."
"The customization is an area that needs improvement."
"In terms of the container strategy, they need to make it more compliant with the Linux OS."
"f Microsoft Azure can provide GUI dashboards for end-users and administrators to work separately to manage all the Kubernetes clusters without a need to connect to Azure environments and through CLI it would be better."
"In the future, I would like to see it generalized and have the ability to better integrate with open-source tools."
More Amazon Elastic Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Azure Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon Elastic Container Service is ranked 1st in Containers as a Service (CaaS) with 46 reviews while Microsoft Azure Container Service is ranked 2nd in Containers as a Service (CaaS) with 7 reviews. Amazon Elastic Container Service is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Azure Container Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon Elastic Container Service writes "An easy to compute solution that can be used to take complete workloads to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Container Service writes "Reliable, expandable and great for Microsoft-heavy environments". Amazon Elastic Container Service is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Linode, whereas Microsoft Azure Container Service is most compared with .
See our list of best Containers as a Service (CaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Containers as a Service (CaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
