We performed a comparison between Amazon ECR and IBM Cloud Container Registry based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is how it organizes the code and the infrastructure."
"In the case of Amazon ECR, there are various valuable features we can see. Currently, there are image-scanning capabilities that we use."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon ECR is its ease of use and the centralized management console."
"The most tool's valuable feature is image scanning."
"What I like most about Amazon ECR is that it's swift."
"The solution is very stable."
"One feature of Amazon ECR that I find particularly useful is its web interface, which makes management easy. The ability to manage and support token image updates is crucial for us. Moreover, utilizing load balancers via AWS features allows us to manage all traffic."
"The product is efficient and can be used for multiple environments."
"Amazon ECR's manipulation capability of tags needs to be improved."
"Amazon ECR needs to improve its downtime."
"It would be great if they could also provide a reference to fix the errors or vulnerabilities in the images rather than just notifying us about them."
"One area for improvement in Amazon ECR is its complexity. It's pretty complex for newbies, particularly learning about private repositories, including how to access Amazon ECR through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)."
"Improving the documentation for easy understanding will help bring in more clients to use Amazon ECR."
"Amazon ECR should improve the integration with Amazon CloudWatch. For example, allowing us to monitor the queues better. Additionally, some of the features could be made more accessible."
"Its support for system architecture needs improvement."
"IBM Cloud Container Registry should improve its API management. One improvement factor could be enhancing the integration capabilities of container registries like Harbor with hyperscaler platforms. While some container registries, like Azure Container Registry and IBM Cloud Container Registry, are tightly integrated with their respective hyperscaler environments, others may lack integration options."
Amazon ECR is ranked 1st in Container Registry with 7 reviews while IBM Cloud Container Registry is ranked 7th in Container Registry with 1 review. Amazon ECR is rated 9.6, while IBM Cloud Container Registry is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon ECR writes "Scalable solution with an easy initial setup process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Container Registry writes "A free solution that is beneficial for customers who cannot afford to create new containers on-premises". Amazon ECR is most compared with JFrog Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Harbor, Google Container Registry and VMware Harbor Registry, whereas IBM Cloud Container Registry is most compared with .
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
