Compare Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Amazon S3 Glacier

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Amazon S3 Glacier and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage.""Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pros »

"The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3.""I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower.""We like that the price is cheaper."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros »

Cons
"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to.""It could be better in connecting with Windows Server instances."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Cons »

"The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data.""I would like to see the retrieval time reduced."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products.""There is no license, you pay for what you use."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface.
Top Answer: It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage.
Top Answer: It could be better in connecting with Windows Server instances.
Top Answer: I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower.
Top Answer: The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data. People will want to keep the content for a… more »
Top Answer: We use S3 as a short-term backup, and we use the Glacier as a long retention backup for our customers. We also use Crosswork to orchestrate from on-prem to the cloud. For example, we had a customer… more »
Ranking
Views
7,926
Comparisons
7,494
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
401
Rating
8.5
Views
4,370
Comparisons
4,124
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
404
Rating
8.7
Comparisons
Also Known As
Amazon Glacier
Learn More
Overview

Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.

When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.

It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

Offer
Learn more about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)
Learn more about Amazon S3 Glacier
Sample Customers
Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider19%
Media Company9%
Manufacturing Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company23%
Media Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Amazon S3 Glacier and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 7th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 2 reviews while Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 10th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8.6, while Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "Enables us to predict our storage needs over time and start small and grow as we need ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective cloud storage service with good support". Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Google Cloud Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Google Cloud Storage Nearline and Oracle Cloud Object Storage, whereas Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Block Storage, Google Cloud Storage, Wasabi and Oracle Cloud Archive Storage. See our Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Amazon S3 Glacier report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.