We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Google Kubernetes Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is the best service because it has proper security packages."
"Amazon EKS is like Kubernetes, but it helps manage our nodes and scalability in AWS."
"What I found most valuable in Amazon EKS is its maturity as a cloud computing technology."
"The solution has very good basic features."
"We do not have to do a lot of administration, such as create virtual machines, or worry about our controllers or nodes going down because the solution is fully managed by Amazon."
"The most important aspect of Amazon EKS is that it is easy to set up and very easy to upgrade."
"It has valuable monitoring and insights features."
"Initial setup is straightforward. It only takes 15 minutes to deploy."
"I am impressed with the product's output scaling."
"Google Kubernetes Engine's most valuable features are microservices and its acquisition rate, which is very useful for scaling perspective."
"The initial setup is very easy. We can create our cluster using the command line, or using our console."
"Stability-wise, this solution is really good."
"We used automation for the initial setup. It was okay. So it wasn't too complex."
"On the tip of a command, you can scale in or scale out, and it offers every robust platform to implement DevOps processes for your automation solutions. The product fully supports the IaC concept."
"Google Kubernetes Engine's most valuable feature is container deployment."
"I am satisfied with the stability offered by the solution."
"There is room for improvement in stability. I faced some problems with the App."
"I'd like to see the solution add a service catalog."
"They should include some essential configuration features to it."
"The connectivity could be better."
"Setup depends on what kind of architecture you have"
"I'm having difficulty getting my AWS clusters to communicate with my local machine."
"The documentation part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."
"Amazon EKS is not a solution that can be fully managed through automation, making it an area of concern where improvement is required."
"The tool's configuration features need improvement."
"It needs to support load balancing."
"Their documentation is a little here and there. Sometimes, the information is not clear or updated. Their documentation should be a little bit better."
"Google Kubernetes Engine's cost should be improved because it is high."
"The product’s visible allocation feature needs improvement."
"The user interface is a bit confusing sometimes. You need to navigate between the various consoles we have. It's hard to figure out where things are. It's frustrating. The documentation could be a bit better."
"t is not very stable."
"I would like to see the ability to create multiple notebook configurations."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 37 reviews while Google Kubernetes Engine is ranked 10th in Container Management with 31 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Google Kubernetes Engine is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Can be used to implement and create clusters, but assigning permissions to users is difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Kubernetes Engine writes "The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and Linode, whereas Google Kubernetes Engine is most compared with Kubernetes, Linode, OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Rancher Labs. See our Amazon EKS vs. Google Kubernetes Engine report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.