We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Rancher Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I found most valuable in Amazon EKS is its maturity as a cloud computing technology."
"The product helps us to configure the new environment."
"I like its auto-scale feature very much."
"AWS cloud services are flexible and have thorough documentation. AWS also has data centers all over the world."
"Overall Amazon EKS is a good solution in the industry. The solution can support multi tendencies, and network isolations are the key factors."
"Provides high performance and easy manageability."
"The most valuable feature is the computing speed."
"We do not have to do a lot of administration, such as create virtual machines, or worry about our controllers or nodes going down because the solution is fully managed by Amazon."
"The solution is stable."
"The scalability potential is very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is an open-source solution that is easy to deploy."
"The initial setup is simple and straightforward."
"Rancher Labs is a very user-friendly tool."
"The most valuable feature of Rancher Labs is its user interface, which makes it easier to work with containers and deployment."
"The solution has a lot of good features, such as you can access the console and edit through the GUI. The dashboard and the UI are designed well, user-friendly, and easy to manage, and access."
"A great UI with very good integrations."
"A cluster is required on-premises, which takes a lot of time."
"The documentation part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"Amazon EKS is not a solution that can be fully managed through automation, making it an area of concern where improvement is required."
"An area for improvement in Amazon EKS is the user experience. The platform could be more user-friendly. Only an expert can manage and use it."
"The tool's setup is complex."
"I would like to see it a little more stable, more operational, and more convenient to develop."
"They should include some essential configuration features to it."
"There needs to be an improvement in observability and microservice monitoring tools in Rancher Labs."
"We'd like their monitoring tool to be integrated by default."
"The biggest room for improvement in Rancher Labs would be to have a proper upgrading plan."
"They should improve application visibility along with code visibility."
"We have found that the auto-secure feature of this solution doesn't always work, and could be improved to be more reliable, particularly when working with business critical applications."
"We're looking for something that is even easier to use. It's a bit complicated."
"The solution could improve by adding more features in the dashboard, such as monitoring, scanning, and security. This would be a great benefit."
"I can't migrate to the newer version."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 37 reviews while Rancher Labs is ranked 5th in Container Management with 12 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Rancher Labs is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Can be used to implement and create clusters, but assigning permissions to users is difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rancher Labs writes "An easy-to-use user interface, which makes it easy to work with Kubernetes and containers". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Linode and HashiCorp Nomad, whereas Rancher Labs is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, OpenShift Container Platform, Docker, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Google Kubernetes Engine. See our Amazon EKS vs. Rancher Labs report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.