We performed a comparison between Amazon Elastic Container Service and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address and resolve them. The product helps to have a global file system. Also, it helps in data replication from region to region."
"The product's most valuable feature is service discovery functionality. It is an excellent feature impacting cost reduction."
"Performance is our top priority. So, if we need to deploy on a high-specification machine, we can choose it from the software. If we just need a low-specification one, we can just choose it based on the requirement handling software configuration."
"Amazon EC2 Container Service is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the volume size they offer."
"The solution is easy to scale and implement and provides performance monitoring and management tools."
"What I really like about Amazon ECS is its simplicity and ease of use. Amazon also has really good security."
"ECS is a useful platform."
"The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code."
"We can do a lot of provisioning."
"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."
"The solution is embedded in the hypervisor and there are no deployment costs."
"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."
"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The technical support is excellent."
"Since it is a managed service for container orchestration, it may limit our control over certain infrastructure functions."
"Support could be better with response time and knowledge of staff."
"The solution could provide more reliability."
"The pricing could be a bit better."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service."
"The solution can still be expensive, even with per-second billing."
"Billing is extremely complex."
"I also believe there are limitations in terms of upgrading. The software has the concept of dedicated servers that you can manage. However, an issue arises when you can't match one operating system with another that you've already purchased. You can't simply merge them; instead, you have to buy a completely new one. This limitation has caused some challenges for us."
"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."
"We need a backup of production clusters."
"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."
"I have issues with the product's interoperability."
"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."
"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."
"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."
"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."
More Amazon Elastic Container Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon Elastic Container Service is ranked 8th in Container Management with 46 reviews while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is ranked 11th in Container Management with 9 reviews. Amazon Elastic Container Service is rated 8.4, while Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon Elastic Container Service writes "An easy to compute solution that can be used to take complete workloads to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE writes "Stable platform with an easy initial setup process ". Amazon Elastic Container Service is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, Microsoft Azure Container Service, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Google Kubernetes Engine and Linode, whereas Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and NGINX Ingress Controller. See our Amazon Elastic Container Service vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
