Compare Amazon ElastiCache vs. IBM Cloud Databases for Redis

Amazon ElastiCache is ranked 4th in In-Memory Data Store Services while IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is ranked 3rd in In-Memory Data Store Services. Amazon ElastiCache is rated 0, while IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is rated 0. On the other hand, Amazon ElastiCache is most compared with , whereas IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
1
Comparisons
0
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
6
Comparisons
4
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Learn
Amazon
IBM
Overview

Amazon ElastiCache allows you to seamlessly set up, run, and scale popular open-Source compatible in-memory data stores in the cloud. ... Amazon ElastiCache offers fully managed Redis and Memcached for your most demanding applications that require sub-millisecond response times.

Databases for Redis gives two Redis instances—a master and a replica member—with Redis sentinels monitoring both. Accessing the database is managed through a single Kubernetes Nodeport, behind which one or more HAProxy instances handle all the traffic. It’s the HAProxy instances that manage to which we’ve added support for TLS/SSL encryption for incoming connections to the Redis server—something Redis doesn’t do out-of-the-box currently.

Offer
Learn more about Amazon ElastiCache
Learn more about IBM Cloud Databases for Redis
Sample Customers
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Information Not Available
We monitor all In-Memory Data Store Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.