• Home
  • Amazon Fraud Detector vs. ThreatMetrix

Amazon Fraud Detector vs ThreatMetrix comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo

Amazon Fraud Detector

Read 1 Amazon Fraud Detector review
747 views|169 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
ThreatMetrix Logo

ThreatMetrix

Read 7 ThreatMetrix reviews
3,144 views|1,918 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Fraud Detector and ThreatMetrix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quickly and reliably identifies potentially fraudulent activity
In machine learning, we may measure a metric, something called recall — the other metric is false-positive. A recall refers to the total amount of... Read more →
Anonymous User
Provides good scalability, but it could be more intuitive
Integrating the solution with the banking APIs effectively provides a confidence score for calls. It helps users detect suspicious activities such... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I am not aware of the price. I have always come in after it has been negotiated. The clients do get a return on their investment. It mitigated a massive DDoS, and it definitely detects fraudulent activities on banking platforms. They have definitely got their ROI back because there is continued investment in ThreatMetrix over time."

    • More ThreatMetrix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about ThreatMetrix?
    Top Answer:It is a stable solution.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ThreatMetrix?
    Top Answer:The pricing could be lower. We are a young company. Maybe for big enterprises, price doesn't matter. However, for young companies, price-wise, it's not that good. It's a bit pricey. You also have to… more »
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What needs improvement with ThreatMetrix?
    Top Answer:The solution needs upscaling in terms of interface. It could be intuitive.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ranking
    16th
    out of 64 in Fraud Detection and Prevention
    Views
    747
    Comparisons
    169
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 64 in Fraud Detection and Prevention
    Views
    3,144
    Comparisons
    1,918
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    389
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AWS Cloud9 IDE, Cloud9 IDE
    Learn More
    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    ThreatMetrix
    Overview

    Amazon Fraud Detector is a fully managed service that makes it easy to identify potentially fraudulent online activities such as online payment fraud and the creation of fake accounts. Globally each year, tens of billions of dollars are lost to online fraud.

    ThreatMetrix Digital Identity Network constantly identifies fraudsters from trusted customers by analyzing more than 850 transactions each second of every day. It defends against data breach and credential testing from bots designed to mimic human behavior and evade detection by web application firewalls and integrates fraud and risk data across the enterprise with behavioral information on more than 1.4 billion digital identities for smarter, faster and better risk decisioning.
    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Trip Advisor, Stone Hub, TD Bank, Rabobank, GoPro
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Legal Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company6%
    Retailer5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon Fraud Detector is ranked 16th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while ThreatMetrix is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 7 reviews. Amazon Fraud Detector is rated 8.0, while ThreatMetrix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon Fraud Detector writes "Quickly and reliably identifies potentially fraudulent activity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatMetrix writes "Stable with a good interface and offers excellent event reports". Amazon Fraud Detector is most compared with Riskified and IBM Trusteer, whereas ThreatMetrix is most compared with BioCatch, FICO Falcon Platform, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, iovation FraudForce and IBM Trusteer.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.