We performed a comparison between Amazon Macie and CoSoSys Endpoint Protector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool gives confidence that our configuration is safe."
"The tool's performance is good."
"I like the data protection feature. Our users were working on a client's CRM application with a lot of client-related EIA information. We did not want the users to be able to send any of this data outside. I also like its ability to protect against data leaks via emails and social media. I like that you can deploy it quickly, and it requires no training."
"We like that content-aware and device controls can easily be managed. They're not complicated. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand them."
"There are effectively two areas of DLP to look at from a technical perspective. One is how it performs the pickup of information traversing the system and the other is how the policy engine, which analyzes the data, works. On the first aspect, CoSoSys is probably best of breed for macOS because they're reasonably well-integrated into the operating system. They're looking at the file system operations level, not at the execution level."
"All of the features are effective, but the highlight feature of the product was the data layer inspection. When we talk about a DLP product, data packet inspection is very important. Securing data at rest is easy, but securing data in transit is challenging. We used it comprehensively to secure end drives, data transfers, secure hard drives, and end-user machines. It proved monumental in our operations."
"Endpoint Protector's best features are its protection and user-friendliness."
"One unique feature is drive encryption. We have portable devices, and they have a password vault. If you transfer any data to your device, you can use the password vault to protect it."
"The core of its value lies in obtaining logs remotely and exercising control over what employees can or cannot use."
"The software is easy to use and the dashboard is intuitive."
"Amazon Macie is expensive."
"Because it is only an Endpoint Protector at this point in time, it does not have a network DLP component. There's only an endpoint DLP component. In the future, it would be good if a network DLP component could be embedded and extended to have network DLP capabilities."
"I would rate the role-based access features for administrators a six out of ten. There's work to be done on the granularity of roles that can be assigned to an administrator but there is role-based administrator access present. That's why it's not a zero rating."
"CoSoSys Endpoint Protector's network-level DLP and integration with mail servers need improvement."
"We are using it to only apply media restrictions. When we are installing a new agent, we have to install EPP manually on a device. It would be great if the installations can be done from the server instead of me going to each PC or device to implement EPP or using a policy. They should have some sort of system so that a domain admin can install EPP on all PCs from a central manager."
"Sometimes, it should try to focus on one thing rather than multiple things. Endpoint Protector does device control very well, which is why we use that particular function."
"I would like to see an alert feature that when a system is started, it checks to make sure that the client has the most up-to-date policies."
"The only aspect that prevents it from being a perfect solution is the occasional slower response time."
"This product provides zero-day protection for macOS, although I'm currently dealing with an issue on the most recent rollout of the Endpoint client that doesn't seem to be fully functioning."
Amazon Macie is ranked 21st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while CoSoSys Endpoint Protector is ranked 8th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 25 reviews. Amazon Macie is rated 6.6, while CoSoSys Endpoint Protector is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon Macie writes "The solution's performance is good but needs improvement in pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CoSoSys Endpoint Protector writes "Makes management and upgrades easier and provides better control". Amazon Macie is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas CoSoSys Endpoint Protector is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Safetica ONE, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Zscaler DLP. See our Amazon Macie vs. CoSoSys Endpoint Protector report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
