Amazon MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
3,061 views|2,679 comparisons
Aurea Logo
447 views|124 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon MQ and Aurea CX Messenger based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
David Onuh
Radhey Rajput
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance.""Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

More Amazon MQ Pros →

"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required.""The solution offers excellent stability.""ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all.""The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need.""The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.""The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros →

Cons
"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors.""Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

More Amazon MQ Cons →

"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs""I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included.""The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services.""You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely.""It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc.""The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."
  • More Amazon MQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."
  • "You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"
  • "The pricing is not so high."
  • More Aurea CX Messenger Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution.
    Top Answer:I would like to see Amazon MQ introduce other messaging queues like IBM MQ with an easily configured plugin. I would also like to see Amazon MQ offer only one IP instead of two. Right now, they give… more »
    Top Answer:We take our managed matrices and messages and add them to Amazon MQ. We have consumer services that pick out from these queues and combat these queues before pushing to another endpoint or a new… more »
    Top Answer:The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are no additional fees to the standard license.
    Top Answer:The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web service and cloud functionality. If Aurea could include these features in the future… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,061
    Comparisons
    2,679
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    434
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    124
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    456
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

    CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

    Sample Customers
    SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting
    Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government6%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon MQ is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 2 reviews while Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews. Amazon MQ is rated 9.0, while Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon MQ writes "Provides you with a URL where you can either send or retrieve messages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". Amazon MQ is most compared with Amazon SQS, Apache Kafka, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and Red Hat AMQ, whereas Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and Apache Kafka.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.