We performed a comparison between Amazon Neptune and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Managed NoSQL Databases."Relational databases are never good at identifying patterns in graphs or other similar relationships, whereas Amazon Neptune is."
"The best feature is the velocity to make a query."
"Since it's a managed service, Azure backend handles scalability. From a user's perspective, we don't need to worry about scalability."
"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's most valuable feature is latency."
"Its wide support to the ecosystem is valuable. We can use this database with a lot of use cases, and that's one of the reasons why we prefer it. We have a lot of vendors, databases, and use cases, and wherever possible, we are trying to standardize databases. It is also secure."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB were the general infrastructure, ease to use, and interface."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is scalable with multiple master files."
"The most valuable features for our organization with Azure Cosmos DB are multi-master capability for applications, automatic failover ensuring high availability, scalability, support for multiple data models, and low-latency access."
"The solution is extremely user-friendly and easy to navigate."
"Amazon Neptune could improve by spreading more awareness for others to have an understanding of the solution because the technology is fairly new. The developer community and larger community do not understand it yet."
"Sometimes, the solution's access request takes time, which should be improved."
"The tool's pricing is expensive."
"It is not as easy to use as DynamoDB."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's performance could be better. In large volumes of documents, the querying process becomes slow and complicated."
"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's pricing model is complicated, which people don't understand."
"I would like the speed of transferring data to be improved."
"I have been a devoted Microsoft fan, but Redis DB's memory caching capabilities are really making progress. Even if Cosmos DB is continuously improving and is quite advanced in the field of internal memory optimization, I would still recommend Redis DB to a customer."
Earn 20 points
Amazon Neptune is ranked 4th in Managed NoSQL Databases while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is ranked 1st in Managed NoSQL Databases with 38 reviews. Amazon Neptune is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon Neptune writes "Useful pattern identification, price well, and straightforward implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB writes "Removes bottlenecks related to databases in our application and works quickly because of reference keys". Amazon Neptune is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB, Neo4j AuraDB, Amazon Timestream and Amazon DocumentDB, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Bigtable, Amazon DocumentDB, Neo4j AuraDB and Amazon Timestream.
See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.