We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases."The product enables the users to query results faster."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"The tool performs well."
"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."
"The installation is difficult."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
Amazon QLDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Amazon QLDB is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon QLDB writes "A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Amazon QLDB is most compared with MongoDB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, InfluxDB, ScyllaDB and Couchbase.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.