Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

Amazon S3 Glacier offers robust features, efficient customer support, varying deployment timelines, cost-effective pricing, and a significant ROI. Users mention slower data retrieval times and interface improvements. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage Nearline emphasizes affordability, scalability, durability, ease of use, and integration capabilities. Users appreciate the helpful customer service, differing deployment timeframes, fair pricing, and positive ROI. They suggest improvements in speed, support, documentation, pricing structure, and integration capabilities.

Features: Amazon S3 Glacier is favored for its long-term storage capability and seamless integration with other AWS services. Google Cloud Storage Nearline is known for its cost-effectiveness, scalability, ease of use, and integration capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Amazon S3 Glacier is reported to be straightforward and easy to navigate, while the setup cost for Google Cloud Storage Nearline is mentioned to be minimal and hassle-free, facilitating a smooth onboarding process. Additionally, the licensing options for Amazon S3 Glacier are commended for being flexible and accommodating, while the licensing terms for Google Cloud Storage Nearline are described as clear and straightforward., Users have found a highly positive ROI with Amazon S3 Glacier, praising its cost-effectiveness and reliability. Similarly, Google Cloud Storage Nearline also provides significant ROI and benefits.

Room for Improvement: Users have identified areas for improvement in both Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline. For S3 Glacier, faster retrieval time and a more user-friendly interface are desired. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage Nearline needs improvements in speed, documentation, support, pricing, and integration capabilities.

Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Amazon S3 Glacier suggest that the duration to establish a new tech solution can vary, with some users taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, while others only need a week for both. On the other hand, feedback for Google Cloud Storage Nearline indicates varying timeframes, with some users spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup. However, it's important to consider the context in which users use these terms., Customers have reported positive experiences with the customer service and support provided by both Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline. They appreciate the prompt assistance and expertise of the support teams for each platform.

The summary above is based on 31 interviews we conducted recently with Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a scalable and easy-to-manage solution with good read-write capability.""The product automatically replicates objects from a S3 bucket in one region to another bucket in a different region.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a stable and scalable solution.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution.""The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable and available solution."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"It can isolate files and stop them from corrupting other files.""The capacity and space on offer are excellent.""I find the flexibility in storing documents or data and the ease of retrieval valuable with this solution.""The data structure and the types of data that are supported are very good.""It provides the necessary support and flexibility to manage data storage effectively, especially during times of variable data flow.""Google is always introducing new features and tends to have a new release every month.""Nearline is highly stable.""The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see improved storage capacity and enhanced security features for better protection.""The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low.""Amazon S3 Glacier could be more secure.""There is room for improvement in handling GDPR compliance better. GDPR is about personal data protection and retention. It would be great if S3 Glacier could handle compliance items related to this, especially with upcoming legislation like the California law, which restricts data storage time and allows users to request data deletion.""The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved.""The solution's cost optimization could be improved.""Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand.""The pricing is a bit expensive. There is room for improvement in costs."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"They should provide more options or flexibility in terms of pricing.""The suggestion for improvement primarily revolves around cost efficiency.""The interface for managing file storage in the buckets could be improved.""Nearline security could be better. The solution could integrate better with SEIM tools.""The UI could be a little bit more effective.""They need a better, more visual, user interface for folders and files.""The solution needs to offer better System Information and Event Management (SEIM). I'd like to discover how we could implement something like that within Google's cloud.""The pricing is quite high."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Right now, for the number of servers and the storage that I have, I would say I'm charged between $125 and $150 per month."
  • "Google Cloud Storage Nearline is very inexpensive. It costs us less than $50 a month to store our files. We use approximately 10 terabytes. Overall, I would rate the product a five out of five for affordability."
  • More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, which… more »
    Top Answer:Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable and available solution.
    Top Answer:The solution's cloud storage is very expensive, and users may not be able to afford cloud storage.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline.
    Top Answer:The pricing of the different storage classes is hard to compare. The higher the zone, the higher the price. The advantage is that you can access the data frequently, and the speed of the response is… more »
    Top Answer:The UI could be a little bit more effective. Now, the UI is just a white background, but it's really helpful if there are options to change the theme. I prefer that.
    Ranking
    Views
    6,841
    Comparisons
    5,846
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    2,033
    Comparisons
    1,796
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    557
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Glacier
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    A low-cost, highly-durable and highly available storage service for infrequently accessed data, data archiving, online backup and disaster recovery. Data is available instantly, not within hours or days. With sub-second average response times and 1 cent per GB/month pricing, Cloud Storage Nearline gives you terrific performance at a low cost.

    Sample Customers
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Integrator4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization29%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization7%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise37%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 5th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 34 reviews while Google Cloud Storage Nearline is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 8 reviews. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Google Cloud Storage Nearline is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage Nearline writes "Provides APIs for everything and has good protection through encryption". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Wasabi and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), whereas Google Cloud Storage Nearline is most compared with Amazon S3, Wasabi, Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store), Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Microsoft Azure File Storage. See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.