We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support is excellent."
"Some of the most valuable features are how convenient and easy to use S3 is. It's nicely integrated with AWS and is available on the AWS console."
"Easy to use, very intuitive, fast, and quite flexible."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 is storage, which provides a personal capacity."
"Amazon S3 is very flexible and provides high storage."
"We find the archival capabilities of this solution quite valuable, because we can have set policies of exactly when, and what to archive."
"The scalability of Amazon S3 is good."
"The product helps to define storage type based on the requirement."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"The solution needs to improve test recognition."
"The down side is the web app should be aware of all the features that S3 provides in order to leverage its full potential."
"Maybe it could be a bit cheaper."
"We have used the support from Amazon S3. The support is expensive and could be reduced."
"The solution requires you to buy and use Amazon services."
"When we need to find the queries there is no user interface, it is the only textual format that is bulky. If we need some data we will use Athena for queries and we will get results. When comparing this solution to others, such as DataDog, they provide a wonderful UI, and user-friendly dashboards, and many other features that this solution is lacking."
"Could include some additional security features."
"It is expensive for storing."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The scalability could improve."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
Amazon S3 is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 65 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Zadara, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Amazon S3 vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
