We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."
"With SQS, we can trigger events in various cloud environments. It offers numerous benefits for us."
"I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."
"The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective."
"One of the useful features is the ability to schedule a call after a certain number of messages accumulate in the container. For example, if there are ten messages in the container, you can perform a specific action."
"There is no setup just some easy configuration required."
"We use the tool in interface integrations."
"We use SNS as the publisher, and our procurement service subscribes to those events using SQS. In the past, we relied on time-based or batch-based processes to send data between services on-premises. With SQS, we can trigger actions based on real-time changes in business processes, improving reliability."
"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"
"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"The product's reliability is the most valuable feature."
"I cannot send a message to multiple people simultaneously. It can only be sent to one recipient."
"The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises."
"As a company that uses IBM solutions, it's difficult to compare Amazon SQS to other solutions. We have been using IBM solutions for a long time and they are very mature in integration and queuing. In my role as an integration manager, I can say that Amazon SQS is designed primarily for use within the Amazon ecosystem and does not have the same level of functionality as IBM MQ or other similar products. It has limited connectivity options and does not easily integrate with legacy systems."
"The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."
"I do not think that this solution is easy to use and the documentation of this solution has a lot of problems and can be improved in the next release. Most of the time, the images in the document are from older versions."
"Sending or receiving messages takes some time, and it could be quicker."
"It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."
"There are some issues with SQS's transaction queue regarding knowing if something has been received."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."
"The availability could be better."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
Amazon SQS is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 13 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 38 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Stable, useful interface, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Redis, Amazon MQ, Anypoint MQ and Red Hat AMQ, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service. See our Amazon SQS vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
