We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and Red Hat AMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."
"I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."
"We use the tool in interface integrations."
"SQS is very stable, and it has lots of features."
"The libraries that connect and manage the queues are rich in features."
"I am able to find out what's going on very easily."
"With SQS, we can trigger events in various cloud environments. It offers numerous benefits for us."
"The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective."
"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."
"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."
"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."
"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."
"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."
"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises."
"I cannot send a message to multiple people simultaneously. It can only be sent to one recipient."
"It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."
"The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."
"Sometimes, we have to switch to another component similar to SQS because the patching tool for SQS is relatively slow for us."
"Sending or receiving messages takes some time, and it could be quicker."
"Support could be improved."
"There are some issues with SQS's transaction queue regarding knowing if something has been received."
"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."
"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."
"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."
"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."
"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."
"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."
"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."
Amazon SQS is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 13 reviews while Red Hat AMQ is ranked 8th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while Red Hat AMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Stable, useful interface, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat AMQ writes "A stable, open-source technology, with a convenient deployment". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Redis, Amazon MQ and Anypoint MQ, whereas Red Hat AMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, IBM MQ, VMware RabbitMQ and PubSub+ Event Broker. See our Amazon SQS vs. Red Hat AMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
