We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."SQS is very stable, and it has lots of features."
"I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."
"It is stable and scalable."
"We use the tool in interface integrations."
"The libraries that connect and manage the queues are rich in features."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."
"With SQS, we can trigger events in various cloud environments. It offers numerous benefits for us."
"The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective."
"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"The solution can scale."
"The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."
"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"
"It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."
"Sometimes, we have to switch to another component similar to SQS because the patching tool for SQS is relatively slow for us."
"Sending or receiving messages takes some time, and it could be quicker."
"I cannot send a message to multiple people simultaneously. It can only be sent to one recipient."
"There are some issues with SQS's transaction queue regarding knowing if something has been received."
"Support could be improved."
"Be cautious around pay-as-you-use licensing as costs can become expensive."
"The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"The availability could be better."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
Amazon SQS is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 12 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 38 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Stable, useful interface, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Redis, Amazon MQ, Anypoint MQ and Red Hat AMQ, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service. See our Amazon SQS vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
