AWS Step Functions vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,271 views|3,608 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
991 views|783 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Step Functions and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's Amazon, it's scalable.""What I like the most about Amazon Step Functions is how easy it is to use.""The number of historical events is great.""It is a scalable solution.""AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices.""One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature.""The solution is stable...The solution is easy to scale.""It's a general solution that you can adapt to your own needs and is simple to use. We like that it can be integrated with everything in the AWS suite, and that the creation of the pipeline can be done using the graphical user interface."

More AWS Step Functions Pros →

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs.""The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search.""The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great.""The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams.""This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository.""We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes.""The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good.""It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros →

Cons
"It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language.""It wasn't easy to understand the licensing model. It's like if you use just a little, it's cheap, but it becomes more expensive as you use more. It's like a hook that ties you inside the Amazon ecosystem. So, it creates a dependency.""I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic.""Setup took about one day. We had some errors to understand in the beginning, but now everything is working good.""The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes.""The solution's data size limit can be improved.""The price and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve.""The pricing of the solution can be improved."

More AWS Step Functions Cons →

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support.""They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them.""Integration is an area where the solution lacks.""OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format.""The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use.""If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option.""I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit.""They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution's price is reasonable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More AWS Step Functions Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
  • "On-premises version is expensive"
  • "SharePoint uses a subscription model."
  • "There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
  • "OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
  • "The solution has a very complex pricing model."
  • "Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
  • "It has a reasonable price."
  • More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices.
    Top Answer:I was the second member to join a team tasked with creating a proof of concept. My responsibility was to demonstrate how to orchestrate microservices effectively using AWS Step Functions. Essentially… more »
    Top Answer:Orchestrating microservices with Step Functions provides a high-level abstraction for organizing entire workflows. This approach addresses the challenges that arise when working with multiple… more »
    Top Answer:The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams.
    Top Answer:OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers subscription-based licensing. It has a reasonable price. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use. They could enhance the integration with Power BI and make it seamless, similar to Teams.
    Ranking
    Views
    4,271
    Comparisons
    3,608
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    991
    Comparisons
    783
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    505
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions
    Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Step Functions lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows so you can build and update apps quickly. Using Step Functions, you can design and run workflows that stitch together services such as AWS Lambda and Amazon ECS into feature-rich applications. Workflows are made up of a series of steps, with the output of one step acting as input into the next. Application development is simpler and more intuitive using Step Functions, because it translates your workflow into a state machine diagram that is easy to understand, easy to explain to others, and easy to change. You can monitor each step of execution as it happens, which means you can identify and fix problems quickly. Step Functions automatically triggers and tracks each step, and retries when there are errors, so your application executes in order and as expected.

    With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
    Sample Customers
    Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite
    iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government12%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Step Functions is ranked 12th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 8 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. AWS Step Functions is rated 7.8, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Step Functions writes "Simplifies complex task automation and enhances development workflows while offering user-friendly interface, seamless scalability and efficient workflow orchestration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". AWS Step Functions is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow, Pega BPM and Oracle BPM, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda. See our AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.