Compare Amdocs Revenue Management vs. Ericsson Revenue Management

Amdocs Revenue Management is ranked 2nd in Revenue Management while Ericsson Revenue Management is ranked 1st in Revenue Management. Amdocs Revenue Management is rated 0, while Ericsson Revenue Management is rated 0. On the other hand, Amdocs Revenue Management is most compared with Ericsson Revenue Management and Accenture Revenue Management, whereas Ericsson Revenue Management is most compared with Amdocs Revenue Management, Cisco Revenue Management and Oracle Revenue Management.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
2nd
out of 7 in Revenue Management
Views
599
Comparisons
536
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
1st
out of 7 in Revenue Management
Views
720
Comparisons
616
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Learn
Amdocs
Ericsson
Overview
Amdocs Revenue Management portfolio lets service providers consolidate their business support systems, services and processes across all lines of business. It supports in Creating, managing, and collecting all sources of revenue to enable service providers to define and launch services in real time through any channel has never been easier. Regardless of the type of service, customer, or complexity of the partner settlement.Ericsson Revenue Management solutions solve billing and charging challenges, with the functionality and is designed to support a step-by-step transformation to the Digital world that is being built with 5G and IoT. The solutions are catalog driven and pre-integrated with other Ericsson solutions such as self-care, analytics, OSS and Core, and also supports available standards for multivendor integration. Products include: BSCS iX, Catalog Manager, Charging System, Multi Mediation, Order Care and Revenue Manager.
Offer
Learn more about Amdocs Revenue Management
Learn more about Ericsson Revenue Management
Sample Customers
AAPT, A1 Telekom Austria, Alestra, America Movil, Anunciosen Directorios (ADSA), Astro, AT&T Drive Studio, AT&T Mobility, AT&T Services, Bakcell, Belgacom, Bell Canada, BendBroadband, Bezeq, BT Plc, Cable Bahamas, Cablevision, Cellcom GSM, Cellcom Israel, CenturyLink, Claro Brazil, Claro Chile, CNT, Comcast, Comision Federalde Electricidad (CFE), Cricket Wireless, Crnogorsky TelekomA.D, CSL Limited, Defense Telematica Organization, DIRECTV, Dish Network, Dex One, Eagle Mobile, Efforte lSA, Elion, Elisa, Enel, Eniro, EE, Far Eastone Telecommunications Co.(FET), Fastweb, GET, Globe Telecom, HSBC Bank, Hutchison 3G UK Limited, ICE, Indosat, Interoute Telecommunications Ltd, JSC Kazakhtelecom, Jupiter Telecommunications (J:COM), Kcell, KPN, Kyivstar, Liberty Global, Linkem, Link Net, M1, Melita, MetroPCS, Mobilicity, MobilTel, Movicel, Movilnet, NetCom, Ono, Open Mobile, Openreach, Oi, Optimus, Osnova Telecom, Partner Communications, Pelephone, Post Telecom, Prime Tel, Reliance Communications (RCOM), Rogers Communications, RomTelecom, Rostelecom, Sensis, Singtel, Slovak Telekom, Sprint, Sunrise, Strex, T-Mobile Austria, T-Mobile Czech Republic, T-Mobile International AG, Tata Communications, Tele2 Communications, Telefonica Argentina, Telefonica Chile, Telefonica Czech Republic, Telefonicade Espana, Telefonica O2 Slovakia, Telefonica Peru, Telenet, Telenor Hungary, Telenor Serbia, Tele2 Norway, Telenor Norway, Telenor Sweden, TeliaSonera, Telindus Belgacom ICT, Telkom SA, Telstra, Telus, TIM Brasil, True Corp, Truvo, Transatel, Transvision, Trudon Ltd, U.S. Cellular, Vietnam Telecom National Co., VimpelCom, Virgin Media, Vivo, Vodafone Hutchison Australia, Vodafone Germany, Vodafone Global, Vodafone India, Vodafone Hungary, Vodafone Netherlands, Vodafone Romania, Vodafone UK, XL Axiata, Yell Publicidad, Ziggo, Zon Multimedia, Anonymous Service Provider, 012 SmileVolvo Ocean Race
We monitor all Revenue Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.