• Home
  • AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs. Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AMS 2000 Family [EOL] and Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
11th
out of 23 in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Views
254
Comparisons
219
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Eternus DX400 series
Learn More
Hitachi Vantara
Fujitsu
Overview
The Hitachi Data Systems AMS 2000 storage system includes three array models:
  • AMS 2100 - Smaller system provides up to 120 disk drives ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2300 - Midrange system provides up to 240 disk drives. ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2500 - High-end system provides up to 480 disk drives, ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.

The Fujitsu Storage ETERNUS DX series aligns storage resources with business priorities, thus enabling higher system utilization and delivering increased system consolidation capabilities and a faster ROI. ETERNUS SF provides enterprise-class functionalities in the entry and midrange class and allows flexible disaster recovery and business continuity concepts for the different model sizes, thus decreasing investment costs.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
DDOR Novi Sad
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is ranked 11th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is most compared with HPE StorageWorks MSA and NetApp FAS Series.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.