AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs HPE EVA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hitachi Vantara Logo
views| comparisons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
391 views|326 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AMS 2000 Family [EOL] and HPE EVA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use AMS 2000 Family [EOL]?
VladimirKaploun
Ranking
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Views
391
Comparisons
326
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
EVA P6000 series, HP EVA
Learn More
Overview
The Hitachi Data Systems AMS 2000 storage system includes three array models:
  • AMS 2100 - Smaller system provides up to 120 disk drives ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2300 - Midrange system provides up to 240 disk drives. ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2500 - High-end system provides up to 480 disk drives, ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
Lean IT budgets require more efficient ways of managing data. Driving business growth and agility requires simple yet flexible storage that reduces costs while maintaining application availability. With an installed base of over 100,000, mid-sized organizations count on HP EVA Storage. This fifth-generation, virtualized storage array provides availability while increasing productivity and capacity utilization.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Bank Simpanan Nasional, EDF, Saint Mary's University, Thomson Reuters
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm13%
Computer Software Company11%
Comms Service Provider10%
Manufacturing Company10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise58%
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is rated 0.0, while HPE EVA is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "There is reliable support for HDD replacement". AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is most compared with , whereas HPE EVA is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StorageWorks MSA.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.