AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs Nexsan E series comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AMS 2000 Family [EOL] and Nexsan E series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Views
96
Comparisons
72
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
E series
Learn More
Overview
The Hitachi Data Systems AMS 2000 storage system includes three array models:
  • AMS 2100 - Smaller system provides up to 120 disk drives ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2300 - Midrange system provides up to 240 disk drives. ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2500 - High-end system provides up to 480 disk drives, ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.

We’ve more than doubled the performance of this data center workhorse: As your storage grows, so have your processing requirements. That’s why we’ve more than doubled the performance with our new model, the E-Series P. The battle-tested E-Series Storage Arrays give you the capacity and performance needed for your structured data workloads, along with the ultra-reliability Nexsan is long known for.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
French National Laboratory
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while Nexsan E series is ranked 15th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Nexsan E series is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Nexsan E series is most compared with .

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.