AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs Oracle Sun Storage 6000 Array Family comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AMS 2000 Family [EOL] and Oracle Sun Storage 6000 Array Family based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Views
66
Comparisons
51
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sun Storage 6000 Array Family
Learn More
Overview
The Hitachi Data Systems AMS 2000 storage system includes three array models:
  • AMS 2100 - Smaller system provides up to 120 disk drives ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2300 - Midrange system provides up to 240 disk drives. ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2500 - High-end system provides up to 480 disk drives, ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
Oracle's Sun Storage 6000 array series both minimizes acquisition and operation costs and maximizes the return on your storage investments. Designed with flexibility, reliability and availability in mind, Oracle's enterprise disk portfolio is versatile enough to address the primary and secondary storage needs of both rapidly growing small businesses and enterprise organizations. As your trusted technology partner, Oracle stands behind these products to ensure that you have the right storage foundation for achieving your business goals.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
TDC A/S, Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while Oracle Sun Storage 6000 Array Family is ranked 20th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Oracle Sun Storage 6000 Array Family is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle Sun Storage 6000 Array Family is most compared with .

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.