AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs Scale Computing M-Series comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AMS 2000 Family [EOL] and Scale Computing M-Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Views
81
Comparisons
72
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
M-Series
Learn More
Overview
The Hitachi Data Systems AMS 2000 storage system includes three array models:
  • AMS 2100 - Smaller system provides up to 120 disk drives ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2300 - Midrange system provides up to 240 disk drives. ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2500 - High-end system provides up to 480 disk drives, ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.

The M-Series storage nodes offer a range of high-performance hardware choices to meet the increased storage demands of mid-sized enterprises with high-activity applications and virtual environments.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Iron County Schools, Mo-Ranch Assembly, City of St. Cloud, Sevier County Bank, St. RichardĀs Catholic College, Summit Pacific Medical Center, Auburn University, Triton School Corporation, Safran, Anamosa School District
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while Scale Computing M-Series is ranked 17th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Scale Computing M-Series is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Scale Computing M-Series is most compared with .

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.