• Home
  • AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs. Scale Computing S-Series

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] vs Scale Computing S-Series comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AMS 2000 Family [EOL] and Scale Computing S-Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use AMS 2000 Family [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Easy VM snapshotting, cloning and exporting.
Physical server consolidation, VM cloning for easy backups, easy sharing/allocation of compute, storage and RAM resources.
Ranking
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
14th
out of 23 in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Views
93
Comparisons
78
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
S-Series
Learn More
Hitachi Vantara
Scale Computing
Video Not Available
Overview
The Hitachi Data Systems AMS 2000 storage system includes three array models:
  • AMS 2100 - Smaller system provides up to 120 disk drives ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2300 - Midrange system provides up to 240 disk drives. ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.
  • AMS 2500 - High-end system provides up to 480 disk drives, ranging in size from 146 GB to 2 TB.

Scale Computing's S-series line of storage products is the storage workhorse for the mid-market. It's perfect for the vast majority of SMB uses cases such as archiving, virtualization, virtual desktops, disk-based backup, and even some database loads. It includes 210 MB of throughput on a three-node cluster.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Iron County Schools, Presbyterian Mo-Ranch Assembly, City of St. Cloud, Sevier County Bank, St. RichardĀs Catholic College, Summit Pacific Medical Center, Auburn University, Triton School Corporation, Safran, Anamosa School District, Karl Strauss, Jasper County REMC, GEO Foundation
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AMS 2000 Family [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while Scale Computing S-Series is ranked 14th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Scale Computing S-Series is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Scale Computing S-Series writes "Easy VM snapshotting, cloning and exporting". AMS 2000 Family [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Scale Computing S-Series is most compared with .

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.