Anakam.TFA vs CA Risk Authentication [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anakam.TFA and CA Risk Authentication [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
46th
Views
107
Comparisons
76
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA RiskMinder
Learn More
Overview

Once users have access to a portal or applications, it is important to identify that the same users are returning in order to maintain security of the system and guard against account take-over, data loss and theft. Multifactor authentication is a simple yet secure way of knowing who is using your applications and ensuring that they are exactly who you expect them to be.

Our strong, multi-factor authentication product offers a range of layered, secure authentication methods in a single integrated platform. It delivers secure one-time passcodes via multiple vectors:

SMS (text messages)

Mobile app

Voice message (IVR)

Hard token

Out-of-band delivery of quickly expiring, one-time passcodes confirms that the person possessing the passcode is the one attempting to access your systems. Multiple authentication vectors ensure high-level security with user-required flexibility and usability.

If a biometric method is required or desired, two-factor authentication can also be done through voice biometrics – a secure, software-based method that doesn't require special hardware or detailed training.

Progressive authentication is our term for the best practice we pioneered—using an integrated set of tools and processes for situation-based authentication of known users seeking access to secure networks, data, and applications.

Based on your policy decisions, our solution will trigger authentication challenges at login or when suspicious transactions, unknown or risky devices, or out-of-norm behavior is recognized. These security authentication parameters can be customized in real-time for users both inside and outside your organization, progressively presenting authentication challenges based upon the latest threat assessment.

CA Risk Authentication is a powerful risk-based, adaptive authentication solution that works in real time to evaluate context, calculate a risk score, recommend actions and provide alerts/case management. It has a strong set of prebuilt rules to detect risk and an easy-to-use risk management console to adjust parameters or create new rules. The risk engine examines many factors including device identification, geolocation, IP address and user activity to evaluate risk. The calculated risk score is then fed into your policies to decide whether to authorize the current activity, request step-up authentication and/or send an alert or block the activity. This provides your organization with a transparent layer of protection against identity theft, data breaches and fraud. CA Risk Authentication can be used to reduce fraud and protect users from Internet attacks whether they are shopping online or accessing confidential or private information via a Web portal or application. It also provides organizations the ability to enforce different levels of authentication depending on the user activity, transaction value and the calculated risk score.

Sample Customers
Cinemark, City of Phoenix, RehabCare, PepsiAmericas, ServiceMaster, Exelon Corporation, Stein Mart
Global bank based in the United States
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Anakam.TFA is ranked 46th in Authentication Systems while CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems. Anakam.TFA is rated 0.0, while CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". Anakam.TFA is most compared with , whereas CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.