Anakam.TFA vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Equifax Logo
107 views|76 comparisons
RSA Logo
319 views|268 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anakam.TFA and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
  • "Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
  • "Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
  • "The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
  • More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    46th
    Views
    107
    Comparisons
    76
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    25th
    Views
    319
    Comparisons
    268
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Once users have access to a portal or applications, it is important to identify that the same users are returning in order to maintain security of the system and guard against account take-over, data loss and theft. Multifactor authentication is a simple yet secure way of knowing who is using your applications and ensuring that they are exactly who you expect them to be.

    Our strong, multi-factor authentication product offers a range of layered, secure authentication methods in a single integrated platform. It delivers secure one-time passcodes via multiple vectors:

    SMS (text messages)

    Mobile app

    Voice message (IVR)

    Hard token

    Out-of-band delivery of quickly expiring, one-time passcodes confirms that the person possessing the passcode is the one attempting to access your systems. Multiple authentication vectors ensure high-level security with user-required flexibility and usability.

    If a biometric method is required or desired, two-factor authentication can also be done through voice biometrics – a secure, software-based method that doesn't require special hardware or detailed training.

    Progressive authentication is our term for the best practice we pioneered—using an integrated set of tools and processes for situation-based authentication of known users seeking access to secure networks, data, and applications.

    Based on your policy decisions, our solution will trigger authentication challenges at login or when suspicious transactions, unknown or risky devices, or out-of-norm behavior is recognized. These security authentication parameters can be customized in real-time for users both inside and outside your organization, progressively presenting authentication challenges based upon the latest threat assessment.

    RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
    Sample Customers
    Cinemark, City of Phoenix, RehabCare, PepsiAmericas, ServiceMaster, Exelon Corporation, Stein Mart
    ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm47%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Anakam.TFA is ranked 46th in Authentication Systems while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. Anakam.TFA is rated 0.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". Anakam.TFA is most compared with , whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and IBM Trusteer.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.