Anakam.TFA vs SecureKey comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Equifax Logo
109 views|80 comparisons
SecureKey Logo
105 views|84 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anakam.TFA and SecureKey based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
46th
Views
109
Comparisons
80
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
45th
Views
105
Comparisons
84
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Once users have access to a portal or applications, it is important to identify that the same users are returning in order to maintain security of the system and guard against account take-over, data loss and theft. Multifactor authentication is a simple yet secure way of knowing who is using your applications and ensuring that they are exactly who you expect them to be.

Our strong, multi-factor authentication product offers a range of layered, secure authentication methods in a single integrated platform. It delivers secure one-time passcodes via multiple vectors:

SMS (text messages)

Mobile app

Voice message (IVR)

Hard token

Out-of-band delivery of quickly expiring, one-time passcodes confirms that the person possessing the passcode is the one attempting to access your systems. Multiple authentication vectors ensure high-level security with user-required flexibility and usability.

If a biometric method is required or desired, two-factor authentication can also be done through voice biometrics – a secure, software-based method that doesn't require special hardware or detailed training.

Progressive authentication is our term for the best practice we pioneered—using an integrated set of tools and processes for situation-based authentication of known users seeking access to secure networks, data, and applications.

Based on your policy decisions, our solution will trigger authentication challenges at login or when suspicious transactions, unknown or risky devices, or out-of-norm behavior is recognized. These security authentication parameters can be customized in real-time for users both inside and outside your organization, progressively presenting authentication challenges based upon the latest threat assessment.

SecureKey is an identity and authentication provider that simplifies consumer access to online services and applications. SecureKey’s next generation privacy-enhancing identity and authentication network enables consumers to conveniently and privately assert identity information using trusted providers, like banks, telcos and governments, and help them connect to critical online services with a digital credential they already have and trust.
Sample Customers
Cinemark, City of Phoenix, RehabCare, PepsiAmericas, ServiceMaster, Exelon Corporation, Stein Mart
Government of Canada
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Anakam.TFA is ranked 46th in Authentication Systems while SecureKey is ranked 45th in Authentication Systems. Anakam.TFA is rated 0.0, while SecureKey is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Anakam.TFA is most compared with , whereas SecureKey is most compared with .

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.