Compare Anaqua IAM vs. CPA Global

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Anaqua IAM Logo
365 views|267 comparisons
CPA Global Logo
513 views|363 comparisons
Ranking
Views
365
Comparisons
267
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
513
Comparisons
363
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
IAM
Learn More
Overview

ANAQUA Enterprise solution goes beyond traditional IP management to deliver 360° IAM with business, market and legal views of a company's IP assets integrated with automated workflows, internal and external data, workspaces and anywhere mobile access.

A suite of products that helps you better manage your IP data and surface the right information at the right time to support improved IP decision making. Add to this our big data and analytics capabilities and we can provide the intelligence and insight that will super-charge your IP strategy to deliver more competitive advantage.

Offer
Learn more about Anaqua IAM
Learn more about CPA Global
Sample Customers
Novo Nordisk
Honda, NESTE Oil, Dongjin Semichem, Webb Law, Kilpatrick Stockton, Sparke Helmore
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider12%
Performing Arts8%
Healthcare Company8%

Anaqua IAM is ranked 2nd in Intellectual Property Management while CPA Global is ranked 1st in Intellectual Property Management. Anaqua IAM is rated 0.0, while CPA Global is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Anaqua IAM is most compared with Quantify IP Global IP Estimator, whereas CPA Global is most compared with RSG RightsLogic, Quantify IP Portfolio Estimator and Quantify IP Global IP Estimator.

See our list of best Intellectual Property Management vendors.

We monitor all Intellectual Property Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.