Compare Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. ScopeMeter

Anritsu Oscilloscopes is ranked 6th in Oscilloscopes with 6 reviews while ScopeMeter is ranked 8th in Oscilloscopes with 1 review. Anritsu Oscilloscopes is rated 7.8, while ScopeMeter is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Anritsu Oscilloscopes writes "Gives you the capability to increase the voltage strength more than what you have in your signal, but it could use more dynamic features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScopeMeter writes "Maintenance is important with this type of product, and this product's battery life is very good". Anritsu Oscilloscopes is most compared with , whereas ScopeMeter is most compared with National Instruments (NI) Oscilloscopes.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Keysight Technologies, Tektronix, Rohde & Schwarz and others in Oscilloscopes. Updated: October 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The Pulse Pattern Generator (PPG) and Error Detector are co-located, which makes it easier to use because I can just probe it directly on the PCB.The jitter function included into the system has helped me in terms of improving the capabilities of our product.It gives you the capability to increase the Tap levels and voltage strength more than what you have in your signal.The user interface is easy, simple, and practical.The most valuable feature is its frequency range.It supports the PAM-4 encoding scheme. We use that to do our PAM-4 receiver validation.We can extract signal loss, skew, DKDF... and the tool is very flexible.

Read more »

Using the user interface is pretty easy to use. Everybody can use it in engineering area.Maintenance is important with this type of product, and this product's battery life is very good.

Read more »

Cons
I would like a better GUI with navigation. This should make it easier to compare to competitors, like Textronix or Keysight.Sometimes, the forms keep changing because of new product technology. If they could reduce the amount of change in the form, this would be good.Right now, it's a minimal tool. They could make it more dynamic by adding dynamic features, which could help us with doing effective analysis.I would like the frequency range to be extended because of the speed. Electronics are moving forward to higher speeds, so it's better to have higher frequencies.The product's antennas and radar applications need improvement.The user interface is a bit complicated because they have so many tabs. If they could simplify it, this would be helpful and appreciated.I would like to see them improve the software. The new version can be improved. It's not quite stable. It restarts a lot.

Read more »

The scopes should be more powerful for our tests. This is extremely important for our products. We need to reach the probing point in our products, and this is extremely hard for us sometimes.The customer relationship should be more advanced/developed. Documents on the website should be more accessible and easily understandable.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing is costly.Price-wise, it is much cheaper than its competitors.The first version of the product is always expensive, then once there is competition, it will be cheaper.I think everyone gets a demo before purchasing.It's very expensive equipment and cannot be upgraded after five years. If you buy equipment today, in five years, it won't be upgradeable. You have to upgrade it within the first five years that you buy it.Pricing is always expensive. It would be better if they lowered the price.It is expensive, but I guess that is why it works.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Oscilloscopes solutions are best for your needs.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
out of 10 in Oscilloscopes
Views
157
Comparisons
37
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
446
Avg. Rating
7.8
8th
out of 10 in Oscilloscopes
Views
65
Comparisons
14
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
363
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
BERTWave SeriesFluke Oscilloscopes, ScopeMeter Portable Oscilloscopes, Fluke 190 Series II, Fluke 120B Series, Fluke MDA-500 Series
Learn
Anritsu
Fluke Corporation
Video Not Available
Overview

Anritsu sampling oscilloscope is an ideal solution for Eye pattern analyses and Eye Mask tests. In addition, The excellent performance and high sampling speed reduce measurement times and help hold-down equipment costs.

ScopeMeter Portable Oscilloscopes take you into territory that standard bench oscilloscopes cant readily withstand, harsh, hazardous and dirty industrial environments. These hand-held instruments combine the performance of a bench oscilloscope with a multimeter and paperless recorder for installing, commissioning and maintaining industrial and electronic equipment out in the field. Fluke ScopeMeter test tools use a unique Connect-and-View mode to automatically and continuously setup the oscilloscope making them easy to use even on complex signals.

Offer
Learn more about Anritsu Oscilloscopes
Learn more about ScopeMeter
Find out what your peers are saying about Keysight Technologies, Tektronix, Rohde & Schwarz and others in Oscilloscopes. Updated: October 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email