We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Deploy and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation."The solution's most valuable aspect is that it is vendor-agnostic and it has a file called Manifest, which makes it possible for developers, ops people, and system admins to cooperate."
"This product is an innovative market leader in the field of application deployment."
"The solution creates a manifest file that caps the bridge between the developer and the system admin."
"There are so many models that I don't have to create one."
"The API for exposing all our infrastructure services is the most valuable feature."
"Its checking and validating ensures our packages are properly patched."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its configuration management, drift management, workflow templates with the visual UI, and graphical workflow representation."
"The automation manager is very good."
"The user interface is well-built and very easy to navigate around."
"Feature-wise, the solution is a good open-source software offering broad support. Also, it's reliable."
"The playbooks and the code the solution uses are quite useful."
"The solution currently has a bug that causes performance issues. They need to resolve this in a future release."
"While it is a flexible product and provides a means of integrating with virtually anything, the company should make a better effort to keep up with new platform integrations."
"The tool needs to improve on cloud-native GitOps."
"What I'm trying to figure out, personally, is, when doing mass updates, how I can parallelize that a little bit better. It seems right now - and maybe, it's a shortcoming on my end - that I run through one set of servers, and then another set of servers, ad then another set of servers, but it seems like I could throw a lot of these checks out. Different types of servers, like web servers and DB servers, if I could parallelize that a little bit to make everything run a little bit more efficiently, that would help."
"The job workflow needs to be worked on. It's not really clear to how you actually link things together. What they probably could do is provide an example workflow on how to stitch things together. I think that would be very helpful."
"It needs better documentation."
"There are some options not available in the community edition of the solution."
"I have seen indications that the documentation needs improvement. They are providing a "How to Improve Your Documentation" presentation at this conference."
"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is not the best at server provisioning. Terraform is better."
"The solution must be made easier to configure."
"There needs to be improvement in the orchestration."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Digital.ai Deploy is ranked 14th in Release Automation with 11 reviews while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is ranked 3rd in Release Automation with 58 reviews. Digital.ai Deploy is rated 7.4, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Deploy writes "Besides for the flash GUI which is a pain, it includes all of the features we were looking for". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform writes "Capable of broad integrations with easy-to-operate infrastructure and user controls". Digital.ai Deploy is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, GitLab and Digital.ai Release , whereas Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is most compared with Red Hat Satellite, Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Aria Automation, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Microsoft Intune.
See our list of best Release Automation vendors.
We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.