Compare Ansible vs. IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ansible Logo
36,407 views|28,460 comparisons
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager Logo
181 views|148 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCL, Red Hat and others in Configuration Management. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now."

More Ansible Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It has improved our organization through provisioning and security hardening. When we do get a new VM, we have been able to bring on a provisional machine in less than a day. This morning alone, I… more »
Top Answer: We have tested out Ansible Tower, but there is a budget issue, so that is in our next phase. Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right… more »
Top Answer: When you set up Playbooks, I may have one version of the Playbook, but another member of the team may have a different vision, and we will not know which version is correct. We want to have one… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
3rd
Views
36,407
Comparisons
28,460
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
1,116
Rating
9.0
3rd
Views
181
Comparisons
148
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Tivoli Provisioning Manager
Learn More
Overview
Ansible is the simplest way to deploy your applications. It gives you the power to deploy multi-tier applications reliably and consistently, all from one common framework. You can configure needed services as well as push application artifacts from one common system.
Tivoli Provisioning Manager helps organizations optimize efficiency, accuracy and service delivery by automating best practices for data center provisioning activities.
Offer
Learn more about Ansible
Learn more about IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager
Sample Customers
HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
KPJ Healthcare Berhad, Keyword, Tennis Australia, Cxense ASA, SKIData AG, Unisys, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, RAVInvest, Odin, Chapman University, CloudHesive, Cima Solutions Group, Projetech, Grow Strategy
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company27%
Comms Service Provider13%
Legal Firm13%
Financial Services Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise75%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCL, Red Hat and others in Configuration Management. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ansible is ranked 3rd in Configuration Management with 2 reviews while IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is ranked 3rd in Cluster Provisioning. Ansible is rated 9.0, while IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Ansible writes "Its agentless, making the deployment fast and easy". On the other hand, Ansible is most compared with SCCM, BigFix, Red Hat Satellite, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) and UrbanCode Deploy, whereas IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is most compared with Automic Workload Automation.

See our list of .

We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.