We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Red Hat's open source approach was a factor when choosing Ansible, since the solution is free as of right now."
"If you only need to use Ansible, it's free for any end-user, but when you require Ansible Tower, you need to pay per Ansible Tower server."
Earn 20 points
Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM allows IT to maximize investments. It enables administrators to leverage existing processes by using SCCM as the single pane of glass to manage both PCs and Mac computers.
Ansible is ranked 3rd in Configuration Management with 5 reviews while Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM is ranked 27th in Configuration Management. Ansible is rated 8.4, while Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Ansible writes "Enables us to efficiently manage an almost unlimited number of nodes". On the other hand, Ansible is most compared with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, Red Hat Satellite, BigFix, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Parallels Mac Management for Microsoft SCCM is most compared with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.