Anypoint MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anypoint MQ and Aurea CX Messenger based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk.""Good interface, simple to use and stable.""The most valuable feature of Anypoint MQ is it comes with MuleSoft so we don't have to maintain separate components.""Messaging and queueing solution that has good stability and scalability. It can be used for a variety of messaging types.""The solution is very scalable with solid performance and the capability of extending it using any custom Java in case you don't have anything out of the box. MDP is strong. It is good compared to other products regarding its capabilities in managing or orchestrating the issue load.""The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good.""The use of ACK is valuable.""It's easy to use and comes as a bundle package with the Anypoint Platform, removing the need for any complex setup."

More Anypoint MQ Pros →

"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.""SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required.""The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages.""The solution offers excellent stability.""The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need.""ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros →

Cons
"Information on monitoring could be improved.""It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved.""There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities.""The solution is very costly. The solution should provide a package with fewer capabilities at a lower price for specific companies that don’t have a big IT budget. Not every customer requires all the capabilities of the software. It will be a good fit in the market, and they will easily sell it more.""The product does not provide a priority level for the message.""Anypoint MQ's capabilities are mainly used for messaging purposes, but it doesn't have typical use cases that extend as far as other Message Queue software.""The customer service is not good enough""The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."

More Anypoint MQ Cons →

"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.""You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely.""It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc.""Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs""I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included.""The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"
  • "Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."
  • "The solution has a high price."
  • "The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."
  • More Anypoint MQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."
  • "You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"
  • "The pricing is not so high."
  • More Aurea CX Messenger Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product does not provide a priority level for the message. It also does not have Topic. It has an exchange instead of Topic. The users request for the Topic functionality. Such functionalities are… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is used in many projects. I'm an IT consultant. I use the tool when there's a need for asynchronous messaging.
    Top Answer:The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are no additional fees to the standard license.
    Top Answer:The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web service and cloud functionality. If Aurea could include these features in the future… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    5,558
    Comparisons
    3,603
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    6.9
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    124
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    456
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Mule MQ
    CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Anypoint MQ is an enterprise multi-tenant, cloud messaging service that performs advanced asynchronous messaging scenarios between applications. Anypoint MQ is fully integrated with Anypoint Platform, offering role based access control, client application management, and connectors.

    Anypoint MQ supports hybrid use cases, IoT where you collect data from different devices, and a REST API you can use with device applications. You can also use Anypoint MQ with other application frameworks such as node.js, to communicate to queues.

    CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

    Sample Customers
    State of Colorado, PacificComp, Panviva
    Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government6%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Anypoint MQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 9 reviews while Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews. Anypoint MQ is rated 6.8, while Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Anypoint MQ writes "Enables seamless API integrations but lacks SFTP and large file support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". Anypoint MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Amazon SQS, IBM MQ and VMware RabbitMQ, whereas Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and Apache Kafka.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.