We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and ARIS Process Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."
"The best feature is the customization."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"The solution is quite configurable so it is easy to code within a configuration kind of environment."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"Development on Apache Airflow is really fast, and it's easy to use with the newer updates. Everything is in Python, so it's not hard to understand. They also have a graphical view, so if you are not a programmer and you are just an administrator, you can easily track everything and see if everything is working or not."
"One of its most valuable features is the graphical user interface, providing a visual representation of the pipeline status, successes, failures, and informative developer messages."
"Since Apache works very well on Python, we can manage everything and create pipelines there."
"It's a very easy-to-use product."
"Ability to use all the features that your catalog has inside the modeling and export it to a BPM augmentation engine."
"Using this solution we can design our own processor governance, assign some specific technical services, and also run tests of the process to make sure it operates as we need it to."
"We need to develop our workflow description and notations because out of the box, Apache Airflow does not provide some features that are needed."
"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"Programmatically, it's very good, and it doesn't have any competitors, but you cannot develop anything in Airflow UI. You need to develop everything within the program. In the market, other tools have come up recently as competitors to Airflow, and they also give graphical programming options, whereas Airflow doesn't provide that feature currently. All the DAGs you want to build need to be coded in Python."
"The dashboards could be enhanced."
"The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky."
"UI can be improved with additional user-friendly features for non-programmers and for fewer coding practitioner requirements."
"Adding more automated components in Apache Airflow for basic things like exporting the data would be helpful."
"The solution uses a coding language for process design that is specific only to this product. We would like to see this changed to something more universal."
"It's a bit annoying that you have to use two environments in the older version."
"There is a lot of complexity around licensing."
Apache Airflow is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 29 reviews while ARIS Process Governance is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 7.8, while ARIS Process Governance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ARIS Process Governance writes "A stable solution that allows organizations to design and improve processes easily". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas ARIS Process Governance is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.