We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"The solution's UI allows me to collect all the information and see the code lines."
"The UI is very simple and easy to learn."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"The best feature is the customization."
"I found the following features very useful: DAG - Workload management and orchestration of tasks using."
"Development on Apache Airflow is really fast, and it's easy to use with the newer updates. Everything is in Python, so it's not hard to understand. They also have a graphical view, so if you are not a programmer and you are just an administrator, you can easily track everything and see if everything is working or not."
"The best part of Airflow is its direct support for Python, especially because Python is so important for data science, engineering, and design. This makes the programmatic aspect of our work easy for us, and it means we can automate a lot."
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"Programmatically, it's very good, and it doesn't have any competitors, but you cannot develop anything in Airflow UI. You need to develop everything within the program. In the market, other tools have come up recently as competitors to Airflow, and they also give graphical programming options, whereas Airflow doesn't provide that feature currently. All the DAGs you want to build need to be coded in Python."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"The automation capabilities could be improved; a visual workflow designer and a graphical tool to reduce coding would be very helpful. But for now, it's sufficient for our simple workflows."
"The dashboards could be enhanced."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"The platform's stability needs improvement, particularly regarding occasional interruptions due to networking issues."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.