We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and Genpact Cora SeQuence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"I like the UI rework, it's much easier."
"We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details."
"The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"Programmatically, it's very good, and it doesn't have any competitors, but you cannot develop anything in Airflow UI. You need to develop everything within the program. In the market, other tools have come up recently as competitors to Airflow, and they also give graphical programming options, whereas Airflow doesn't provide that feature currently. All the DAGs you want to build need to be coded in Python."
"Technical support is an area that needs improvement."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky."
"The documentation must be improved."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM). Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility. See our Apache Airflow vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.