We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"Apache Airflow's best feature is its flexibility."
"The product is stable."
"Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"Since the solution is programmatic, it allows users to define pipelines in code rather than drag and drop."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"Enhancements become necessary when scaling it up from a few thousand workflows to a more extensive scale of five thousand or ten thousand workflows."
"We cannot run real-time jobs in the solution."
"The solution could be improved by simplifying the integration process."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"The automation capabilities could be improved; a visual workflow designer and a graphical tool to reduce coding would be very helpful. But for now, it's sufficient for our simple workflows."
"Apache Airflow could be improved by integrating some versioning principles."
"The documentation must be improved."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Oracle BPM, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, Camunda and IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Apache Airflow vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.