We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is stable."
"It's stable."
"Its user-friendly interface makes it straightforward to operate, offering a plethora of features for data preparation, buffering, and format conversion."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"The initial setup was straightforward and it does not take long to complete."
"Development on Apache Airflow is really fast, and it's easy to use with the newer updates. Everything is in Python, so it's not hard to understand. They also have a graphical view, so if you are not a programmer and you are just an administrator, you can easily track everything and see if everything is working or not."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"The solution's UI allows me to collect all the information and see the code lines."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"I want to see Apache Airflow have more integrations with more production-based databases since it is an area where the product lacks currently."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."
"The platform's stability needs improvement, particularly regarding occasional interruptions due to networking issues."
"The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky."
"The documentation must be improved."
"Adding more automated components in Apache Airflow for basic things like exporting the data would be helpful."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our Apache Airflow vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.