We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its user-friendly interface makes it straightforward to operate, offering a plethora of features for data preparation, buffering, and format conversion."
"Apache Airflow's best feature is its flexibility."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"The product is stable."
"Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"I like the UI rework, it's much easier."
"We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"Technical support is an area that needs improvement."
"One specific feature that is missing from Airflow is that the steps of your workflow are not pipelined, meaning the stageless steps of any workflow. Not every workflow can be implemented within Airflow."
"We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"The problem with Apache Airflow is that it is an open-source tool. You have to build it into a Kubernetes container, which is not easy to maintain, and I find it to be very clunky."
"The documentation must be improved."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"The dashboard is connected into the BPM flow that could be improved."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Camunda. See our Apache Airflow vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.