Apache Hadoop vs SAP IQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,630 views|2,223 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
571 views|446 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Hadoop and SAP IQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Hadoop vs. SAP IQ Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Syed Afroz Pasha
Mani Velayudhan
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Hadoop File System is compatible with almost all the query engines.""The performance is pretty good.""What I like about Apache Hadoop is that it's for big data, in particular big data analysis, and it's the easier solution. I like the data processing feature for AI/ML use cases the most because some solutions allow me to collect data from relational databases, while Hadoop provides me with more options for newer technologies.""Hadoop is extensible — it's elastic.""Apache Hadoop can manage large amounts and volumes of data with relative ease, which is a feature that is beneficial.""What comes with the standard setup is what we mostly use, but Ambari is the most important.""The most valuable features are powerful tools for ingestion, as data is in multiple systems.""The scalability of Apache Hadoop is very good."

More Apache Hadoop Pros →

"Unbeatable speed and compression with a colummn-structured relational database.""Columnar storage allows high compression, high load rates and high query performance.""Valuable features for us include the compression, speed, fast response time, and easy object maintenance.""It is very robust for ad hoc DW queries and its columnar compression is unique and valuable.""The column-based technologies (basically all the database for ITP) are used for SAP IQ. It is used as a column-based solution.""The primary benefit of SAP IQ is its ability to limit the expansion of the costly SAP HANA database, which has limited storage capacity. This necessitates a form of data management that involves moving data from SAP HANA to SAP NLS, which is essentially archiving. This allows us to retain access to the data via a link whenever it is required."

More SAP IQ Pros →

Cons
"It would be good to have more advanced analytics tools.""The solution could use a better user interface. It needs a more effective GUI in order to create a better user environment.""The stability of the solution needs improvement.""The integration with Apache Hadoop with lots of different techniques within your business can be a challenge.""The upgrade path should be improved because it is not as easy as it should be.""In the next release, I would like to see Hive more responsive for smaller queries and to reduce the latency.""The key shortcoming is its inability to handle queries when there is insufficient memory. This limitation can be bypassed by processing the data in chunks.""The main thing is the lack of community support. If you want to implement a new API or create a new file system, you won't find easy support."

More Apache Hadoop Cons →

"The room for improvement would be the marketing of the product, because this product is much better than advertised.""The organization who owns the product does not support it well and appears not to be doing significant development for the future.""Multiplex is very problematic. There are consistency problems in the metadata, meaning it is possible to lose metadata consistency. You should make sure you have healthy backups.""The solution works best when combined with other SAP solutions. If the environment has other systems other options might be better.""Concurrency and functional error messaging.""I think the universe should be part of the Sybase IQ tool set."

More SAP IQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Do take into consider that data storage and compute capacity scale differently and hence purchasing a "boxed" / 'all-in-one" solution (software and hardware) might not be the best idea."
  • "​There are no licensing costs involved, hence money is saved on the software infrastructure​."
  • "This is a low cost and powerful solution."
  • "The price of Apache Hadoop could be less expensive."
  • "If my company can use the cloud version of Apache Hadoop, particularly the cloud storage feature, it would be easier and would cost less because an on-premises deployment has a higher cost during storage, for example, though I don't know exactly how much Apache Hadoop costs."
  • "We don't directly pay for it. Our clients pay for it, and they usually don't complain about the price. So, it is probably acceptable."
  • "The price could be better. Hortonworks no longer exists, and Cloudera killed the free version of Hadoop."
  • "We just use the free version."
  • More Apache Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Evaluate all options; check to see if you need expensive add-ons."
  • "Negotiate based on the features required."
  • "Negotiation is very important."
  • "The only costs after standard licensing fees are for add-ons and upgrades."
  • More SAP IQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Tools like Apache Hadoop are knowledge-intensive in nature. Unlike other tools in the market currently, we cannot understand knowledge-intensive products straight away. To use Apache Hadoop, a person… more »
    Top Answer:The primary benefit of SAP IQ is its ability to limit the expansion of the costly SAP HANA database, which has limited storage capacity. This necessitates a form of data management that involves… more »
    Top Answer:The solution’s pricing is high, but coverage is good with high implementation with customer requirements.
    Top Answer:The product should add more business intelligence factors.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    2,630
    Comparisons
    2,223
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    532
    Rating
    8.0
    16th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    571
    Comparisons
    446
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    559
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Snowflake logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    SAP HANA logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    SAP BW4HANA logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Sybase IQ
    Learn More
    Overview
    The Apache Hadoop project develops open-source software for reliable, scalable, distributed computing. The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage. Rather than rely on hardware to deliver high-availability, the library itself is designed to detect and handle failures at the application layer, so delivering a highly-available service on top of a cluster of computers, each of which may be prone to failures.

    SAP® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

    Sample Customers
    Amazon, Adobe, eBay, Facebook, Google, Hulu, IBM, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Spotify, AOL, Twitter, University of Maryland, Yahoo!, Cornell University Web Lab
    ASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Comms Service Provider25%
    Hospitality Company6%
    Consumer Goods Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    University6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm55%
    Marketing Services Firm9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise80%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Hadoop vs. SAP IQ
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Hadoop vs. SAP IQ and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Hadoop is ranked 5th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews while SAP IQ is ranked 16th in Data Warehouse with 17 reviews. Apache Hadoop is rated 7.8, while SAP IQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache Hadoop writes "A file system for data collection that contains needed information and files". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP IQ writes "Easy to use, highly stable, but integration could improve". Apache Hadoop is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, Snowflake and Teradata, whereas SAP IQ is most compared with Snowflake, SAP HANA, SQL Server, SAP BW4HANA and SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise. See our Apache Hadoop vs. SAP IQ report.

    See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.