We performed a comparison between Apache HBase and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."Apache HBase is a database used for data storage."
"MongoDB is extremely developer-friendly because when you are starting, there is very little time needed upfront in terms of planning."
"The reports are useful for controlling the load of our whole architecture."
"One of the first things I noticed when I had my first experience with MongoDB was how easy it was to use. I was expecting more difficulties or at least some challenges, but it was very, very easy to use. It's great technology, performs well, and is very convenient."
"I like the document storage feature. It's pretty simple."
"The most valuable feature is that you can store unstructured data, which is helpful when you don't know what the best structure should be and you cannot use a relational database because of that."
"The solution does not hold data in tabular format like SQL does but rather clusters data so that it can link on a large scale."
"The most valuable feature of MongoDB is the NoSQL database. In a SQL database, we need to join data together with a unique ID amongst other things, but in MongoDB, it's not required. We can directly receive all the information. The performance is very good. Additionally, they have frequent updates."
"MongoDB is easy to use."
"I don't like using Apache HBase to store huge amounts of data because of many performance issues."
"The performance of the solution could be improved."
"The performance can be improved."
"The MongoDB documentation can be a little complicated sometimes."
"The solution could have more integration."
"I'd like to see an ID generator. It's very technical but I don't think it has one, so we have to go to great lengths to work around that."
"We'd like technical support to respond faster to queries."
"It is important to note that MongoDB has limitations since it can only be used for specific use cases. For example, for master data, I would want to pick keys using an RDBMS, but for attachments, I would choose MongoDB."
"MongoDB can improve large-size video or media frame operations. There are a lot of customers who want to upload media frames and video games but there is some difficulty. In MongoDB, we are looking out for solutions that are for large-size media files that can be saved and navigated efficiently."
Apache HBase is ranked 10th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 68 reviews. Apache HBase is rated 4.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apache HBase writes "The solution has many performance issues, though it helps manage consumer data sets". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". Apache HBase is most compared with Accumulo, ScyllaDB, Cassandra, Aerospike Database 7 and CouchDB, whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Oracle NoSQL and MarkLogic.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
