We performed a comparison between Apache HBase and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, Apache and others in NoSQL Databases."Apache HBase is a database used for data storage."
"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."
"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure."
"I don't like using Apache HBase to store huge amounts of data because of many performance issues."
"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."
"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."
Apache HBase is ranked 10th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Apache HBase is rated 4.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Apache HBase writes "The solution has many performance issues, though it helps manage consumer data sets". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Apache HBase is most compared with Accumulo, MongoDB, Cassandra, Aerospike Database and CouchDB, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, InfluxDB and CouchDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.