We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options."
"This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees."
"This is an open-source product."
"I was using the free version of the software."
"In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free."
"We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version."
"When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice"
Earn 20 points
Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.
Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 19 reviews while Automai AppLoader is ranked 20th in Performance Testing Tools. Apache JMeter is rated 7.8, while Automai AppLoader is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good performance and easy to configure but could use better UI". On the other hand, Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad and ReadyAPI, whereas Automai AppLoader is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.