We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I was using the free version of the software."
"This is an open-source product."
"In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free."
"When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice"
"We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version."
"I haven't looked into it. Most of our projects are nonprofit or grant-based. Everything is public commons, so we don't really have to worry about that so much."
Earn 20 points
Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.
Cavisson NetCloud is a Software-as-a-service (SaaS) based powerful load generation and performance testing platform. NetCloud allow enterprises to test and validate capacity of their production servers. Leading Fortune 500 brands across the globe rely on Cavisson NetCloud to overcome challenges around high-cost per test besides dealing with limited storage or server capacity.
Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 16 reviews while Cavisson NetCloud is ranked 25th in Performance Testing Tools. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Cavisson NetCloud is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Easy to learn, and free to use but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, ReadyAPI and Tricentis NeoLoad, whereas Cavisson NetCloud is most compared with .
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.