Compare Apache JMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
16,747 views|13,815 comparisons
Cavisson NetStorm Logo
769 views|413 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is free. You don't need to worry about licensing costs.""The solution offers a lot of plug-ins and a huge continuously developing community that is regularly offering new features and plug-ins.""API testing, Database Testing, and MQ testing can be done with ease.""The ease of use is the solution's most valuable feature. Also, the ability to easily create test cases is also very good. It's easy to just ramp up on the solution.""The most valuable feature for us is the available information on the forums and to be able to discuss and get answers from the people that are involved in using this tool.""JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages.""The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.""The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting."

More Apache JMeter Pros »

"Designs dynamic scripts and scenarios, as per our requirements, which is one the most important feature available in NetStorm. It helps us to do performance testing of our application in a periodic way.""NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage."

More Cavisson NetStorm Pros »

Cons
"The user interface is a little bit tricky.""The solution could use some sort of educational features to offer tips and hints to help users navigate it better. They should improve the manuals and help files.""The tool should be made a bit more robust, and better support should be made available.""In future releases, it would be helpful if there was an integration with ALM Octane.""There is some work to be done with the integration.""Considering the kinds of tests we are performing here, where we launch several tests at the same time as a batch request, JMeter is not the best tool for the job. Those kinds of things could be done easily with other tools, like T6.""Automation is difficult in JMeter.""The interface could be made more user-friendly."

More Apache JMeter Cons »

"Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window.""The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs."

More Cavisson NetStorm Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Free""I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options.""This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.""This is an open-source product.""I was using the free version of the software.""In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free.""We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version.""When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice"

More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The scripting ability is most valuable. It is easy to use. There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted… more »
Top Answer: Apache JMeter is under Apache License, Version 2.0 licensing. Understanding licensing requirements is important for the implementation of any tool.
Top Answer: This is a difficult question to answer. On one side, JMeter is very flexible and allows for a high amount of customization. On the other, some tasks are common enough that it merits simplifying the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
16,747
Comparisons
13,815
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
485
Rating
7.6
7th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
769
Comparisons
413
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
640
Rating
9.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
JMeter
Learn More
Cavisson
Video Not Available
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

Cavisson NetStorm is a cost-effective, performance enhancing and easy-to-use appliance for enterprise applications. It is an extremely powerful load generator that provides an accurate estimation of Client Perceived Response Time (CPRT) enabling IT companies to guarantee the Service Level Agreements (SLA). Its advanced technology efficiently handles load variables, user realism, application realism and network realism. NetStorm is a proven solution providing root cause of the issues where legacy solutions failed, prompting Several Fortune 100 companies switching over to using NetStorm.

Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about Cavisson NetStorm
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Oracle, Macy's, Redbox, art.com, Pronto Networks, A10 Networks, Renesas, San Jose Medical Group
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Computer Software Company18%
University6%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm7%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
REVIEWERS
Retailer92%
Computer Software Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer35%
Computer Software Company25%
Energy/Utilities Company19%
University4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise51%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise74%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Load Testing Tools with 18 reviews while Cavisson NetStorm is ranked 7th in Load Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Cavisson NetStorm is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good performance and easy to configure but could use better UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cavisson NetStorm writes "Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad and LoadUI Pro, whereas Cavisson NetStorm is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. See our Apache JMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.