Stephen W. BoydI.T. Architect, Analyst, Developer at a educational organization
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees."
"This is an open-source product."
"I was using the free version of the software."
"In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free."
"We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version."
"When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice"
"I haven't looked into it. Most of our projects are nonprofit or grant-based. Everything is public commons, so we don't really have to worry about that so much."
Earn 20 points
Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.
Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Load Testing Tools with 17 reviews while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is ranked 20th in Load Testing Tools. Apache JMeter is rated 7.8, while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good performance and easy to configure but could use better UI". On the other hand, Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, ReadyAPI and Neotys NeoLoad, whereas Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is most compared with BlazeMeter, SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.