Compare Apache JMeter vs. LoadUI Pro

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
14,461 views|12,087 comparisons
LoadUI Pro Logo
1,782 views|1,576 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is free. You don't need to worry about licensing costs.""The solution offers a lot of plug-ins and a huge continuously developing community that is regularly offering new features and plug-ins.""API testing, Database Testing, and MQ testing can be done with ease.""The ease of use is the solution's most valuable feature. Also, the ability to easily create test cases is also very good. It's easy to just ramp up on the solution.""The most valuable feature for us is the available information on the forums and to be able to discuss and get answers from the people that are involved in using this tool.""JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages.""The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.""The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting."

More Apache JMeter Pros »

"It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well."

More LoadUI Pro Pros »

Cons
"The user interface is a little bit tricky.""The solution could use some sort of educational features to offer tips and hints to help users navigate it better. They should improve the manuals and help files.""The tool should be made a bit more robust, and better support should be made available.""In future releases, it would be helpful if there was an integration with ALM Octane.""There is some work to be done with the integration.""Considering the kinds of tests we are performing here, where we launch several tests at the same time as a batch request, JMeter is not the best tool for the job. Those kinds of things could be done easily with other tools, like T6.""Automation is difficult in JMeter.""The interface could be made more user-friendly."

More Apache JMeter Cons »

"This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features."

More LoadUI Pro Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Free""I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options.""This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.""This is an open-source product.""I was using the free version of the software.""In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free."

More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations.
Top Answer: We have some scenarios for diameter load testing where TPS requirements are very high, 30K or 40K TPS. In the telco area, this is for simulating mobile usage. However, diameter load testing can be… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
14,461
Comparisons
12,087
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
475
Avg. Rating
7.5
10th
Views
1,782
Comparisons
1,576
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
581
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
JMeterLoadUI NG Pro
Learn
Apache
SmartBear
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

Speed is just as important as accuracy when it comes to APIs. A slow API can grind the user experience to a halt, but you don't have to wait for things to go live before understanding how they will behave under heavy load.

With LoadUI Pro, you can reuse your functional API tests built on the industry's #1 open-source based API testing tool, SoapUI Pro to speed testing and reduce the time it takes you to deploy high performance REST and SOAP web services.

Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about LoadUI Pro
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western CapeMercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home Depot
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Computer Software Company23%
University8%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government4%
Media Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise48%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Apache JMeter is ranked 2nd in Performance Testing Tools with 12 reviews while LoadUI Pro is ranked 10th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while LoadUI Pro is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good reports and analysis capabilities with a quick initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LoadUI Pro writes "Facilitates load testing, operational volume testing, and spike testing for the APIs". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, whereas LoadUI Pro is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter, Neotys NeoLoad and SmartBear LoadComplete.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.