Compare Apache JMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is free. You don't need to worry about licensing costs.""The solution offers a lot of plug-ins and a huge continuously developing community that is regularly offering new features and plug-ins.""API testing, Database Testing, and MQ testing can be done with ease.""The ease of use is the solution's most valuable feature. Also, the ability to easily create test cases is also very good. It's easy to just ramp up on the solution.""The most valuable feature for us is the available information on the forums and to be able to discuss and get answers from the people that are involved in using this tool.""JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages.""The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.""The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting."

More Apache JMeter Pros »

"The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.""The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way.""The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center.""The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I"

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pros »

Cons
"The user interface is a little bit tricky.""The solution could use some sort of educational features to offer tips and hints to help users navigate it better. They should improve the manuals and help files.""The tool should be made a bit more robust, and better support should be made available.""In future releases, it would be helpful if there was an integration with ALM Octane.""There is some work to be done with the integration.""Considering the kinds of tests we are performing here, where we launch several tests at the same time as a batch request, JMeter is not the best tool for the job. Those kinds of things could be done easily with other tools, like T6.""Automation is difficult in JMeter.""The interface could be made more user-friendly."

More Apache JMeter Cons »

"Improvements to the reporting would be good.""I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point.""There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other.""I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Free""I switched to Apache because it is free. Other tools are much too expensive and can cost up to $50,000 a year if you are looking at commercial options.""This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees.""This is an open-source product.""I was using the free version of the software.""In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free.""We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version.""When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice"

More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The scripting ability is most valuable. It is easy to use. There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted… more »
Top Answer: Apache JMeter is under Apache License, Version 2.0 licensing. Understanding licensing requirements is important for the implementation of any tool.
Top Answer: This is a difficult question to answer. On one side, JMeter is very flexible and allows for a high amount of customization. On the other, some tasks are common enough that it merits simplifying the… more »
Top Answer: The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of… more »
Top Answer: It's a subscription-based, pay-per-user license. I wouldn't say it's expensive. Because it was an on-premise license, it was a costly affair. Only certain stakeholders could use it. Now, it is… more »
Top Answer: The performance has really improved in terms of running test cycles. The product used to crash on-premises and when it had a lot of trades being pumped in. Because it is memory intensive, it used to… more »
Ranking
Views
16,747
Comparisons
13,815
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
485
Rating
7.6
Views
6,403
Comparisons
4,257
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
486
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
JMeter
StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load
Learn More
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is a simple, smart and scalable cloud-based load and performance testing solution for agile and DevOps teams. It helps you to detect performance issues and ensure that your mobile and web apps are ready for the load. It provides an Intelligent and predictive analytics for fast problem detection and scale up to millions of user in minutes from different regions.

Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Computer Software Company18%
University6%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
REVIEWERS
Educational Organization50%
Financial Services Firm20%
Engineering Company10%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise51%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise54%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 18 reviews while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 6th in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Good performance and easy to configure but could use better UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud writes "Offers good record and playback and endurance features ". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad and Silk Performer, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, BlazeMeter, Neotys NeoLoad and Tricentis Flood. See our Apache JMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.